Someone like this should consider career or technical education.
please mark me brainliest
The later leader-member exchange (LMX) studies shifted focus from describing in- and out-groups to <u>how LMX relates to </u><u>organizational</u><u> </u><u>effectiveness.</u>
<u></u>
The leader-Member exchange idea first emerged in the Seventies. It specializes in the relationship that develops between managers and individuals in their groups. The idea states that each relationship between managers and subordinates goes through three degrees.
The fundamental concept in the back of the leader-member exchange (LMX) principle is that leaders form groups, an in-group and an out-institution, of followers. In-organization members are given greater duties, greater rewards, and more attention. The chief allows these contributors some range of their roles.
The goal of the LMX idea is to explain the effects of leadership on members, teams, and businesses. In keeping with the principle, leaders shape robust belief, emotional, and respect-primarily based relationships with some individuals of a group, however no longer with others. Interpersonal relationships may be multiplied.
Learn more about the leader-Member exchange here brainly.com/question/15706031
#SPJ1
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.
