Answer:
A. sees changes in society as natural, inevitable, and even desirable. change as abrupt, even revolutionary, rather than incremental.
Explanation:
Conflict theory is a social perspective that focuses on the stratification of a harmful and dysfunctional society. There is inequality perpetuated in society and rich people got benefits from the expenses of the poor. Conflict theory was derived from Karl Marx's ideas. The founder of conflict theory was Wright Mills. Mills believed that society is a dynamic perspective in that changes occur. It is not stable but is dynamic. This theory has been criticized on social change and neglects its stability. Many of the critics think that society is the continuous change but point was that changes were not so much incremental or beneficial. Conflict theorists focus on constant change and try to develop a theory on the stability of society.
Answer: The Proclamation of Neutrality was a formal announcement issued by U.S. President George Washington on April 22, 1793 that declared the nation neutral in the conflict between France and Great Britain. It threatened legal proceedings against any American providing assistance to any country at war.
Explanation:
You mean what possible advantage could Oligarchy have?
Oligarchy could mean that people in power will have good education and for example won't be manipulated by populists. For example often people choose their representatives based on very little information, and in an oligarchy, where a small portion of a society (the riches and best educated) rules, it could be more likely that the rulers will have the necessary education and preparaation.
Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.
