1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zzz [600]
3 years ago
8

A dissenting opinion is an opinion of a judge who disagrees with the outcome and reasoning employed by the court majority. A. Tr

ue B. False
Social Studies
1 answer:
Rufina [12.5K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

That statement is True.

Explanation:

In a Jury trial, the judge only play the role as some sort of moderator to ensure that the trial run properly. The judge is not the one that make the verdict, the juries do.

So, there will be some cases where the decisions made by the juries is not aligned with the judge's opinion. In such situation, the judge could create a dissenting opinion. It is some sort of paper that the judge makes to explain his position. He will the legal reason why he doesn't agree with the Juries' opinion. This opinion will be posted for the public to see so we can make better judgement in the future.

You might be interested in
Your mission is to visit the planet Jupiter. What clothes would you wear and what would you wear to survive on this planet? Expl
mina [271]

Answer: I would wear some tipe of suit that can withstand the extreame gravity and the extreame heat.

Explanation: The temperature in the clouds of Jupiter is about minus 145 degrees Celsius (minus 234 degrees Fahrenheit). The temperature near the planet's center is much, much hotter. The core temperature may be about 24,000 degrees Celsius (43,000 degrees Fahrenheit). That's hotter than the surface of the sun!

also the gravity is much more than earth. earth is 9.8m/s² while juipter is 24.79 m/s²

5 0
3 years ago
In the case of a split jury, where half favor "guilty" and the other half favor "not guilty" on the initial vote, it is more lik
kherson [118]

Answer:

Not guilty, leniency

Explanation:

Split jury:

When the jurors are not able to reach to a decision than the decision is either held and presented before a new jury at some later date.

This is when the jury do not have a mutual consent on a verdict.

In the mentioned case if half the jurors favor 'guilty' and the other half are in favor of 'not guilty' then the final verdict is given based on leniency bias.

According to leniency bias in jurisdiction, if a verdict option on a trial is favored by substantial majority of the the jury members, lets say, two-third of the jury favors, then it is very likely for the jury to go with that for the final verdict.

5 0
4 years ago
Explain how teenagers can suffer depression because of the internet.​
pshichka [43]

Answer:

Here are some reasons

1. Self comparison

2. Toxic posts

3. Bullying

4. Spamming

5. Posts from people that show fake things and make them seem real so other are jealous

finding their life useless or unimportant compared to popular people at their school or celebrities

Explanation:

hope this helps!!!:)))

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When it comes to social and political attitudes, the explanation that older people largely hold onto the attitudes they adopted
Aliun [14]
It is called the "<span>Generational explanation".

The states of mind older people embraced when they were youthful hold on to a great extent unaltered; in light of the fact that youngsters adapt distinctive mentalities now, a generation gap develops.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
how does mill go about establishing that that the theory of utilitarianism is compatible with justice?
stira [4]

According to Mill, the main criticism of utilitarianism is that it is incompatible with justice.

As per Mill, utilitarianism is consistent with the key tenets of how we typically conceive about justice.

The common understanding of justice is that certain interests should be given priority; we refer to them as being safeguarded by rights.

An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasizing results. It embodies consequentialism in some way.

According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest good for the largest number of people is the most morally right one.

Mill backs up this assertion by demonstrating how all other things that people desire are either ways to achieve happiness or are part of the concept of happiness.

The sense of justice is essentially founded on utility, and rights only exist because they are required for human enjoyment, according to Mill, who goes into great detail about this.

To know more about justice, visit:

brainly.com/question/7104813

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • O que é marcação individual
    6·1 answer
  • Building meaningful relationships with persons of races different from one's own can result in:
    5·1 answer
  • What is an advantage of projective personality tests?
    13·1 answer
  • A philosophical position that recognizes the complexity of reality and the limitations of human observers and proposes that scie
    12·1 answer
  • Researchers using qualitative methods conduct ___________, which is the time they spend interacting with participants through in
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think people might<br> support radical parties during<br> times of economic difficulties?
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose you are a Supreme
    7·1 answer
  • Redacta un
    7·1 answer
  • A temporary member may enjoy a private clubs services and privileges for a period of.
    15·1 answer
  • The 'Sahiwal' is a breed of which among the following in India?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!