Answer:
Company should not eliminate the North division.
Explanation:
Division B is individually making loss. Overall the company is making profit of $50,000.
After eliminating the North division the overall profit will be converted into the loss of $140,000, because the common corporate expenses were shared by the both divisions, eliminating one cause the whole expense to be allocated to a single division.
Company should not eliminate the division as it will increase the total loss.
Working for on which decision is based is attached with this answer please find it.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
With regards to the above, Jaheem's business profit increase is calculated as
= Fixed cost + Desired profit/Contribution margin
Given that;
Fixed cost = $400,000
Desire profit = $22,000
Contribution margin = $9.4
= $400,000 + $22,000/($24 - $14.6)
= $422,000/$9.4
= $44,894
Therefore, increase on profit
= $44,894 - $22,000
= $22,894
Answer:
The cost of equity is 9.91%
Explanation:
The constant growth model of the DDM is used to calculate the price of the share or the fair value per share based on a constant growth in dividends and the required rate of return which is also known as cost of equity.
Plugging in the available values in the formual we can calculate the cost of equity or the required rate of return.
73.59 = 4.57 / (r - 0.037)
73.59 * (r - 0.037) = 4.57
73.59r - 2.72283 = 4.57
73.59r = 4.57 + 2.72283
r = 7.29283 / 73.59
r = 0.0991 or 9.91%
Answer:
Y = 300
government multiplier 2
output demanded increase by 20
If income tax is applied:
Y = 272.72
multipliers: 2.253775
increase 22.53775 billons
As disclosure it has a larget effect when the income tax is levied based on income rather than a flat rate.
Explanation:
DI = Y - 100
C = 30 + 0.6(Y - 100)
C = 30 - 60 + 0.6Y
C = 0.6Y - 30
Y = C + G + I
Y = (0.6Y -30) + 120 + 30
Y = 120 / 0.4 = 300
C = (0.6)300 - 30 = 150
With C we solve for the multiplier:
150/300 = 0.5
1 / (1 - 0.5) = 2
10 x 2 = 20
If variable that:
C = 30 + 0.6 (0.75Y)
C = 30 + 0.45Y
Y = 0.45Y + 120 + 30
Y = 150/.55 = 272,72
C = 30 + 0.45Y = 152,72
Propensitivity to consume:
152.72/272.72 = 0,5563
multiplier:
1 (1 - PMC) = 2.253775073
10 nillon will icnrease x 2.25377 = 22.54 billons
The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4