Answer:
$ 74.23
Explanation:
We are given the following:
mean, μ = $ 104.50
standard deviation, σ = $ 23.62
Using the z-score table, we have
P(Z < z) = 10% (since we are evaluating lowest 10% of values)
hence P(Z < z) = 0.10
P(Z < -1.282 ) = 0.10
z = -1.282 (this evaluates to 0.1 on the z-score table)
Using z-score formula,
x = z *σ + μ
substituting the values,
x =- - 1.282 * 23.62 + 104.50
= 74.23
The most for the stock is $ 74.23
The answer that is being depicted above is red flag. This is
a process or a way of having to provide reasonable explanation or to alert an individual
when there is a problem that is present in means of having to let them know
about it.
Answer:
The answer is: the real gain in real GDP between 2010 and 2000 is 18.34%
Explanation:
First we have to determine the real GDP using the GDP deflator.
GDP deflator = (nominal GDP / real GDP) x 100
For year 2000:
24 = ($672 billion / real GDP ) x 100
2,400 = $672 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.28 billion
For year 2010:
51 = ($1,690 billion / real GDP ) x 100
5,100 = $1,690 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.331 billion
To calculate the real gain between real GDP from year 2000 to year 2010, we divide real GDP 2010 over real GDP 2000 and subtract 1:
($0.331 billion / $0.28 billion) -1 = 0.1834 x 100% = 18.34%
The answer is President Herbert Hoover. His approach to
depression were:
1.
He tried to restore confidence in the economy by
asking business not to cut payrolls and labor not to ask for higher wages. Most
of them initially agreed until 1931.
2.
He also cut taxes and pressed the Federal
Reserve Board to cut interest rates to make borrowing easier.
3.
He procured $2 billion for public works
projects.
4.
He established the Reconstruction Finance
Corporation and the Home Loan Bank Act to assist businesses and head off some
foreclosures but he was a fiscal conservative who said we couldn't
"squander our way to prosperity," and so he disparate further
spending plans.
Answer:
The answer is: the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was elaborated in response to several high profile corporate scandals involving multinational corporations. The most infamous scandal involved Enron Corporation and Arthur Andersen LLP (one of the five largest accounting corporations in the world).
The SOX set new requirements for all publicly traded corporations (especially their upper management) an public accounting firms. Only some parts of the SOX apply to private companies.
