Explanation:
educate your daughter
teach them them to be independent
teach them to be responsible
encourage them to have their own career
Answer: This description May differ from individuals and also the course of study of this individual.
Let me complete the question by assuming you're studying Chemical Engineering
I am a Chemical Engineering student. I am studying engineering because I love creativity and discovery.
I plan to build a production plant that can produce methane gas from bio degradable. Which will reduce the cost of cooking gas for my community, increase the usefulness of waste, and reduce air and water pollution, thereby making the community clean from bio degradable waste. From my community I will extend the practice all over my country, and to the world.
Explanation:
From our secondary chemistry, we knew that bio degradable waste give out methane gas when decaying, and methane gas is a very combustible fuel.
Many family in my community rear animal, mostly pigs. The pig dunks has lead to constant air and water pollution in my community, so the only way I can help fight this air and water pollution, is by finding the usefulness of this pig dunks. Which is converting the pig dunks to energy.
I KNOW I CAN ACHIEVE THIS BY LOADING A BIOREACTOR TANK WITH PIG DUNKS, USING A BATCH PROCESS, CONNECTING A TUBING AT THE TOP OF THE REACTOR TANK TO EXTRACT THE GAS INTO A GAS CYLINDER, THEN IT CAN BE USED IN THE COOKING CHAMBER.
Theres no pic of the types of tax for this ?
Answer: False
Explanation:
The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't defines materiality as "the magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement." Instead, materiality is defined as “generally states that information is material if there is a substantial likelihood that the omitted or misstated item would have been viewed by a reasonable resource provider as having significantly altered the total mix of information,”
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank.