Answer:
7. $41,000
Explanation:
7. The company has $40,000 of inventory on December, it further purchased $36,000 of inventory in January. The sales in January amounted to $50,000 out of which 30% is gross profit. The cost of goods sold will be $35,000. The inventory that is destroyed by fire $41,000 ($40,000 + $36,000 - $35,000 ).
A change in quantity supplied is a movement along the supply curve, while a change in supply is a shift in the supply curve.
<h3>What is a supply curve?</h3>
The supply curve is a positively sloped curve that shows how quantity supplied changes with price of the good. All things being equal, the higher the price of the good, the higher the quantity supplied.
<h3>What is a change in supply and a change in quantity supplied?</h3>
A change in quantity supplied is as a result of a change in the price of the good. If price increases, quantity supplied increases and if it decreases, quantity supplied decreases.
A change in supply is caused by other factors other than price. Some of these factors include:
- A change in the number of suppliers
- The cost in the price of raw materials needed in the production of the good.
A change in supply leads to a movement outward or inward.
To learn more about supply curves, please check: brainly.com/question/26073189
The sources of pressure are from:
Regulation -government and legislative changes that focus on promoting environmental changes
Resources -natural and other resources are limited and conservation will help save money
Social/reputation-being environmentally conscious gives customers positive feelings about a company
<span>When the economist says that material wants are insatiable, he means that these wants are virtually unlimited and therefore incapable of complete satisfaction. Insatiable means that they are impossibly to satisfy. In the economic world it is best to make use of the limited resources to help satisfy virtually unlimited wants. </span>
Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
