Answer:
Debbie Brooks is the one who will suffer the loss for the checks paid with Brook's forged signature.
Explanation:
Debbie Brooks is the one who will suffer the loss for the checks paid with Brook's forged signature because Brooks was supposed to be checking the statement regarding her accounts frequently . By that, she could have discovered that Tingstrom had taken $85,000 from her checking account with Transamerica Financial Advisors and hence be able to sue her.
After Debbies Brooks discovered what Martha had done, she should have have stopped the transaction immediately but instead another year passed before she filed a suit against Transamerica. Hence, she will be one who will suffer from the forged signature.
Answer:
Redlining
Explanation:
Redlining stems from discrimination that consists denial of services, maybe financial based on the group one may fall under such as race, ethnicity or location. The Holden act(1977) is a real estate act of California meant to protect individuals from discriminations such as ones that involve denial of mortgage loan on the basis of something other than the credit worthiness of the individual . These discriminations could take the form of mortgage loan and, insurance loan denials or other financial services based on creditworthiness history of the group the person may fall under and not necessarily the individual's qualifications on his own
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The reason is that it just makes the most sense. Therefor your answer is A) According to the objective theory of contracts, the intent to enter into an express or implied-in-fact contract is judged by the reasonable people standard
I really hope this answer helps you out! It makes my day helping people like you and giving back to the community that has helped me through school! If you could do me a favor, if this helped you and this is the very best answer and you understand that all of my answers are legit and top notch. Please mark as brainliest! Thanks and have a awesome day!
Answer:
option (C) $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Nominal exchange rate, E = 0.80 euros per dollar
Real exchange rate = 
Now,
Real exchange rate = [ Price of good in US ] ÷ [ Price of Good in Italy ]
= 
Here,
PU = Price of US in dollars
PI = Price of Italy in Euros
Thus,
Real exchange in rate
= 
or
= 
hence,
we get
Ratio of Price of a good in US to Price of a Good in Italy =
or
we can say $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
option (C) $5 in the U.S. and 3 euros in Italy
It went as far as 24hrs into Harry's memory system
