Answer:
b. false.
Explanation:
because it is presented in certain legal contracts as an estimate of otherwise intangible or hard-to-define losses to one of the parties. It is a provision that allows for the payment of a specified sum should one of the parties be in breach of contract.
Answer:
The amount of the increase to the Cash account is $10,450
Explanation:
<em>Cash account </em>
Cash for services performed during July $900
Cash from the issuance of common stock to owners $5350
Cash received from customer as payment for services performed during June $450
Cash Borrowed from bank $2600
Cash received from customer service to be performed during august $1150
Total sum is Cash account increase of $10,450
Answer: $296,880
Explanation:
Pop owns more than 50% of Sugar which means that Sugar is a subsidiary of Pop's. When this happens, trade between the two are not shown in the consolidated financial statement unless the goods traded have been sold off to a third party.
As these goods have not, and are still considered accounts receivable to Sugar, the entire amount will be removed from the consolidated financial statements.
Answer:
The bridge 's owner has a natural monopoly, and the marginal production cost (letting another car drive through it) is close to nil.
Explanation:
Since building several bridges to compete is inefficient, but building one bridge at a lower average cost to customers would be effective. If the private monopolist builds the bridge it can charge customers exceptionally high prices.
There is a high fixed cost involved with constructing a bridge. Hence constructing a bridge is a mere privilege. Furthermore, there is no extra cost to allow another car to cross the bridge. It means that the marginal cost is zero or closer.
It’s clearly contributing to increased integration of labor markets and closing the wage gap between workers in advanced and developing economies, especially through the spread of technology. It also plays a part in increasing domestic & income inequality ^^
