This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read Individualism and Commitment in American Life. By Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton
True or False?
The researchers in Habits of the Heart thought that the individualism of modern life was a benefit to communities of memory.
Answer: False
Explanation:
The scholars understood that individualism created a problem that could be solved through the cultivation of communities of memory. They found that individualism was impoverishing the American language in a way that became more and more challenging for people to talk about commitment. Communities of memory where traces of second languages could be preserved were believed to be capable of transforming the first language of individualism based on the traditions of biblical religion and civic republicanism.
Answer:
To avoid the ethical issues a true experiment would cause.
Explanation:
A quasi-experiment is a factual conventional study that is used to calculate the causal effect of interference on a target population without an irregular function. Quasi-experimental research shares closeness with traditional experimental design or randomized controlled trials, but lacks the element of random assignment specifically for treatment or control.
Instead, quasi-experimental designs typically allow the researcher to control the assignment to treatment status, but use some criterion other than random assignment (For example- an eligibility cutoff mark).
Sounds like rule of law to me. the rule of law states that everyone no matter what are held accountable to the same law. and trump was being held to the same law as any normal citizen here. hope that helped somewhat! :)
They created standard weights and measures
