Answer:
sorry needs more description
Factual evidence is used to appeal to the reader’s sense of logic describes the rhetorical appeal used in illustrating the destructive nature of censorship.
<u>Answer: Option A</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Rudolf Anaya in his poem ‘Take the tortilla out of the poetry’ establishes strong evidence against the censorship of multi-cultural writers and their works. Anaya emphasizes that in the early 1960’s, the books written in another language depicting a different culture, other than English, were banned.
He explains that this was because the books might not be understandable and have no significance to the ‘universal readers’. He supports his argument by providing the evidence of burning his Spanish book in the school by the censor board.
Its D because a clause kinda does have a subject and verd so i think its D
Answer:
1st: is able change to be able
2nd: transform change to transforming
3rd: have the steady speed change to does the steady speed; had any effect change to have any effect
hope this helps:))
The answer is me. Would you like Fred and me to leave for lunch now? Because if you were to say this without Fred you would say, "Would you like me to leave for lunch now" rather than, "Would you like myself to leave for lunch now". So your correct answer is me. Saying myself sounds awkward and is not the correct terminology for this phrase.
I hope this helps!
