Answer:
C) the industry would more closely approximate pure competition
Explanation:
A monopolistically competitive industry is one with different firms selling similar products that are slightly differentiated. It is very easy for firms to enter into industries that are monopolistically competitive. They also have the autonomy to increase their prices.
If the number of firms in a monopolistically competitive industry increases and the degree of product differentiation diminishes they would then resemble a pure competition because they would all be selling identical products which would result in little or no competition.
B) its businesses can invest in the future
Answer:
cash collections from credit sales that the company will include in its cash budget for the second month is $55,500
Explanation:
Second Month Cash Collections will include the following Cash flows:
(1) 60% of the 2nd month`s sales
(2) 35 % of the 1st month`s sales
<u>Therefore cash collections from credit sales :</u>
(1) 60% of the 2nd month`s sales ( $68,000×60%) = $40,800
(2) 35 % of the 1st month`s sales ( $42,000× 35 %) = $14,700
Total cash collections = $55,500
Answer:
The contribution margin ratio is 35%
Explanation:
The formula for contribution is given below:
Contribution margin = revenue − variable costs.
Contribution margin ratio is given as:
(Sales – variable expenses) ÷ Sales
In this case,contribution is given as 1000*($20-$13), in other words selling price per unit minus variable cost multiplied by number of units sold.
Contribution is $7000
contribution margin ratio =$7000/($20*1000)
=0.35 or 35%
The implies that Hollis Industries makes a contribution of 35% per unit of output sold,hence, the contribution contributes towards covering fixed costs and making profit overall
Injuries during working hours at a construction site leads to several legal consequences. If a person gets injured at working site, he/she can file civil law suit for negligence or product liability.
In the above situation, Flo was not wearing any safety wear while working on the construction site of a Grider company. She can file a product liability suit against the Girder company.
The company can most successfully raise the defense of "negligence". Since Flo was not wearing any safety wear during her working hours, the company can raise the defense of negligence because she knew that working on construction site without wearing safety gears may cause harm to her.
