Answer:
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
Explanation:
The doctrine of <em>innocent spouse relief</em> might apply here. Mrs. Jones will have to prove that:
- the income that was omitted was earned by her husband, not her.
- she must prove that when she signed the tax filings, she was not aware of the omission.
- after examining all the facts surrounding the omission, the IRS must decide that blaming her would not be fair.
I think this is a true or false question
The above statement is true.
As we can see that there are always some sort of affinity among people some have highly positive towards some and negative towards others so they will try to group up with the ones they like but this would always lead to dissatisfaction of some people in group as they will feel unfair as they are not in group they wanted but in random assignment no one has control so even if they are unsatisfied they cant blame it on others. So there are lesser differences
Answer: Fundamental attributional error.
Explanation:
Frank is making a fundamental attributional error when judging the cause of Anna's inability to meet sales target. Frank is blaming her failure based on her character rather than on the real reason which is the attractive sales offer of their competitors. Fundamental attributional error is an error which arises from judging a person's action based on their character without considering other possible external causes.
