1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following is not a way birth rate and death rate correlate?

History
1 answer:
Marysya12 [62]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is a low death rate and a low birth rate if there is both a low death and birth rate the population would not rapidly grow it would relatively stay the same so that answer is false
You might be interested in
The 1803 landmark supreme court case marbury v. madison established the principle of
Stella [2.4K]

Explanationakjjfgiadsgkhfgijahdgfohjgasdlhj

3 0
2 years ago
Why did people criticize the French Nobility, the king Louis XVI and the clergy?<br> 
Alecsey [184]
Unfortunately for the French though is recognized it Louis XVI was especially the nobles at the top who where useless and did not contribute to society of efficiency above all else and even criticized the kings palace at Versailles
8 0
4 years ago
Most of the land that central pacific crossed was flat.<br><br> • true<br> • false
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The land that the Central Pacific cross is not flat. The Central Pacific Railroad was a rail company approved by the U.S. government in 1862 that connected America from West to East. The Central Pacific started building rail tracks in Sacramento that proceed to the Sierra Nevada. The Central Pacific had made it through the mountains and the flat land of western Utah. The railroad has played a vital role in the area by encouraging trade, promoting the growth of the agriculture industry.

4 0
3 years ago
The following quote is from British officer Sir William Erskine during the Second Battle of Trenton of the Revolutionary War.
Inessa [10]

B.The British troops didn’t have enough artillery for the battle.

E.The revolutionaries would attack the British troops at night.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the history of the American Revolution prove that owning small firearms is a way for citizens to defend themselves against
Yakvenalex [24]

The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.

<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>

Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.

Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.

They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.

Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Pacific Ocean trade routes by sea?
    6·1 answer
  • According to daniel roselle what are two ways islam improved the lives of people in spain
    5·2 answers
  • Which event is considered a success in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?
    13·2 answers
  • When did WW2 Start? (Will Mark)
    12·2 answers
  • Which best states how to book Don Quixote reflected renaissance humanism
    6·2 answers
  • How did propaganda encourage more Americans to support prohibition in the early 1900’s
    6·1 answer
  • What is 1×10 to the -2 power in decimal notation​
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Hitler kill himself
    8·1 answer
  • In what way did the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles punish
    10·1 answer
  • Give two reasons why archaeology is important today
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!