All categories

3 years ago

Is 2//3 greater than 3/2

Mathematics

2 answers:

steposvetlana [31]3 years ago

4 0

No, because 3/2 is actually 1 1/2. 2/3 isn't even 1

Ksju [112]3 years ago

3 0

2/3= 0.6

3/2=1.5

no 2/3 is not greater than 3/2

I hope that's help.

You might be interested in

Solve for x. Express the answer in simplest form. 2/1 = 8x - 2/ 9

oksano4ka [1.4K]

2=8x-2/9
add 2/9 to both sides
2 and 2/9=8x
2=18/9
2 and 2/9=18/9+2/9=20/9
20/9=8x
multiply both sides by 9
20=72x
divide boht isdes by 72
20/72=x=5/18

4 0

3 years ago

A un tanque que contiene 150 litros de gas propano se le inyecta del mismo gas a razón de 3 litros por segundo. Determina la fun

ElenaW [278]

If only it was in english i could of read it and gave you the answer

7 0

3 years ago

Can anyone help me solve this.I need proper equation..Thanks

artcher [175]

Answer:

y = 9 $\sqrt{2}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the sine ratio in the right triangle and the exact value

sin45° = $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} }$

sin45° = $\frac{opposite}{hypotenuse}$ = $\frac{9}{y}$

Multiply both sides by y

y × sin45° = 9, that is

y × $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} }$ = 9

Multiply both sides by $\sqrt{2}$

y = 9 $\sqrt{2}$

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The function f(x) = 16,800(0.9)x represents the population of a town x years after it was established. What was the original pop

Setler79 [48]

I am guessing that the correct form of equation is:

f(x) = 16,800(0.9)^x
where x is the exponent of (0.9)

Since we are looking for the original population and x stand sfor the number of years, therefore x=0
substituting:
f(x) = 16,800(0.9)^0

Since (0.9)^0 would just be equal to 1. Therefore the original population is 16,800.

Answer: B. 16,800

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mary and Mike went to the store to buy colored pencils for their science class.mike bought a 12-pack for 1.69,and Mary bought a

sweet-ann [11.9K]

12-pack for 1.69 is a better buy

Solution:

Given that, Mike bought a 12-pack for 1.69 and Mary bought a 24-pack for 3.18

We have to find which is the better buy

First we have to find the unit rate

Unit rate is cost of 1 pack

Mike bought a 12-pack for 1.69

Therefore,

Cost of 12 pack = 1.69

Cost of 1 pack is found by dividing 1.69 by 12

$cost\ of\ 1\ pack = \frac{1.69}{12} = 0.14083$

Thus unit rate of Mike is 0.14083 dollar per pack

Mary bought a 24-pack for 3.18

Cost of 24 pack = 3.18

Cost of 1 pack is found by dividing 3.18 by 24

$cost\ of\ 1\ pack = \frac{3.18}{24} = 0.1325$

Thus unit rate of Mary is 0.1325 dollars

On comparing both the unit rate

$0.14083>0.1325$

Thus unit rate of Mike is larger

Thus, 12-pack for 1.69 is a better buy

3 0

2 years ago