"People should remove native plants around watersheds" option should a person avoid doing in order to better protect the quality of watersheds.
<u>Option: A</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Watershed is basically a source of large amount of water like river, sea, etc to another location like lake, ponds and stream.This is seen majorly during rainy season by water harvesting to supply further for farming, portable water plant, manufacturing sectors, enrich habitat to number of plants and animals, etc. Waterways face issues when erosion, pollutants and runoff of animal waste take place, which act as barrier for water flow, as it decreases the quality which affect aquatic animals life, reduce oxygen content. Native plants near watersheds is also a habitat for many animals and species thus it should not be removed until some major flaw occurs.
Answer:
Most of free energy available from oxidation of the glucose remains in pyruvate.
Explanation:
The overall reaction of the process glycolysis is:
Glucose + 2 NAD⁺ + 2 ADP + 2 Pi ⇒ 2 Pyruvate + 2 NADH + 2 H⁺ + 2ATP
Glucose is oxidized to give 2 molecules of pyruvate and 2 molecules of NADH and ATP (Energy currency).
<u>Though the free energy of oxidation of glucose is high but only 2 NADH is formed because the most of the free energy that is being released from the oxidation of glucose remains in the pyruvate which is produced in the reaction and thus only 2 molecules are formed.</u>
<span>C2Br2
First, we need to determine how many moles of the gas we have. For that, we'll use the Ideal Gas Law which is
PV = nRT
where
P = pressure (1.10 atm = 111458 Pa)
V = volume (10.0 ml = 0.0000100 m^3)
n = number of moles
R = Ideal gas constant (8.3144598 (m^3 Pa)/(K mol) )
T = Absolute temperature
Solving for n, we get
PV/(RT) = n
Now substituting our known values into the formula.
(111458 Pa * 0.0000100 m^3) / (288.5 K * 8.3144598 (m^3 Pa)/(K mol))
= (1.11458/2398.721652) mol
= 0.000464656 mol
Now let's calculate the empirical formula for this compound.
Atomic weight carbon = 12.0107
Atomic weight bromine = 79.904
Relative moles carbon = 13.068 / 12.0107 = 1.08802984
Relative moles bromine = 86.932 / 79.904 = 1.087955547
So the relative number of atoms of the two elements is
1.08802984 : 1.087955547
After dividing all numbers by the smallest, the ratio becomes
1.000068287 : 1
Which is close enough to 1:1 for me to consider the empirical formula to be CBr
Now calculate the molar mass of CBr
12.0107 + 79.904 = 91.9147
Finally, let's determine if the compound is actually CBr, or something like C2Br2, or some other multiple. Using the molar mass of CBr, multiply by the number of moles and see if the result matches the mass of the gas. So
91.9147 g/mol * 0.000464656 mol = 0.042708701 g
0.0427087 g is a lot smaller than 0.08541 g. So the compound isn't exactly CBr. Let's divide them to see what the factor is.
0.08541 / 0.0427087 = 1.99982673
1.99982673 is close enough to 2 to within the number of significant digits we have for me to claim that the formula for the unknown gas isn't CBr, but instead is C2Br2.</span>
All oxayacids have cations so no need to name the cation (H+) If name of polyatomic anion ends in -ate change to -ic for acid and if it ends with -ite change to -ous for acid
example:
ion nitrate is called nitric acid
ion nitrate is called nitrous acid
I’ll get back to u on this
