Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Answer:
The answer is below
Step-by-step explanation:
The Angle Addition Postulate states that the measure of an angle formed by two or more angles which are placed side by side is the sum of the measures of the two angles.
Therefore:
∠MON = ∠MOP + ∠NOP (angle addition postulate)
Substituting values gives:
124 = (2x + 1) + (2x + 1)
124 = 2x + 2x + 1 + 1
124 = 4x + 2
subtracting 2 from both sides of the equation:
124 - 2 = 4x + 2 - 2
4x = 122
Dividing through by 4:
4x / 4 = 122 / 4
x = 30.5
Therefore ∠MOP = 2x + 1 = 2(30.5) + 1 = 62°, ∠NOP = 2x + 1 = 2(30.5) + 1 = 62°
∠MOP = 62°, ∠NOP = 62°
Answer:
x = -5
Step-by-step explanation:
to evaluate for x in this this question -5x-(8-x)=12
the firsst step, you would open the bracket with - then evaluate for the value of x
solution
-5x-(8-x)=12
-5x -8 + x = 12
combine the like terms
-5x + x = 12 + 8
-4x = 20
divide both sides by the coefficient of x
-4x/-4 = 20/-4
x = -5
Answer:
46.2
Step-by-step explanation:
If you divide 231 by 5 then you get that answer.