I believe the answer would be: C. Custer and his force arrived ahead of the main U.S. force.
Answer:
the did coms answ tics fords
Answer;
D. the United States suffering no war damage and having a strong economy
Explanation;
-The industrial revolution really caught the US up in the global scheme of things, but it was WWII that put the US (and the Soviet Union) in the forefront as leaders of the world.
-After the war,the US economy was really boosted, while Europe's was practically in shambles. Also, because the US helped Europe significantly in both world wars, it received kind of a morale/self-esteem boost of sorts. Moreover, because the country wasn't physically involved in the war, it didn't have to deal with repairing its land.
Answer:
The ideas behind the Boston Tea Party can still be seen in politics today. The Sons of Liberty were angry about unfair government, so they protested through the destruction of government property. If, in modern day, the government was as unfair as it was during colonial times then these forms of protest would surely be popular. However, it is extremely unlikely that everyone would support it. Even back at the real Boston Tea Party a group called the loyalist did not support the Sons of Liberty. Similar groups would most likely form that would also disagree with a modern-day Boston Tea Party.
Answer:
Woody Allen was considered a true auteur due to his great contributions to the film industry.
Explanation:
Woody Allen has been considered one of the most important elements for North American cinema, since his beginnings in the cinema in the 60s he has written and directed more than forty films to the present. He has been considered not only a director but an auteur due to his great imagination and artistic abilities that have highlighted him and led to the new era of Hollywood cinema with his irreverent creations and with his particular style ranging from drama to comedy going on through different styles.
Allen was able to recover the elements from the European art cinema, in order to have a different view of what has been commonly known till that time; using also elements from the period after the war II to contrast in many cases the histories of love and romance that have been previously presented to the public.
