The dice could either roll 6 and 5 or 5 and 6 which gives us the probability of 2/36.
Answer:
d. None of the above.
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. By the law of large numbers, it would again be 46%.
</em>
FALSE. This proportion (46%) is a sample statistic, that can or can not be repeated in another sample.
<em>b. By the law of large numbers, the smaller (second) survey will certainly produce a sample proportion farther from the true population proportion than the larger (first) survey.
</em>
FALSE. Smaller samples will produce wider confidence intervals for the estimation of the population proportion, but larger samples does not necessarily gives us better point estimations of the true proportion. A small sample can be closer to the true proportion than a large sample, although is less probable.
<em>c. The proportion computed from the sample of 5000 people would be more accurate because smaller samples tend to be more homogeneous than larger samples.
</em>
FALSE. There is no evidence to claim that smaller samples are more homogeneous.
<em>d. None of the above.</em> TRUE
I think it would be C and D but I'm not sure Ik I ain't A or B bc it doesn't tell us how much the almonds r
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Successive terms do not have a common difference or ratio, so the sequence is not arithmetic or geometric. We can get a clue as to its nature a couple of places:
- from the alternating signs, says there is a negative multiplier involved
- from the answer choices
It is helpful to look at the differences of terms:
-5-3 = -8
11 -(-5) = 16
-21-11 = -32
These have a common ratio of -2, so match an exponential form with a ratio of -2 (the last answer choice). Trying that choice with n=1, 2, 3, 4 gives ...
a[1] = 3
a[2] = -2(3) +1 = -5
a[3] = -2(-5) +1 = 11
a[4] = -2(11) +1 = -21
These match the given sequence, so the appropriate recursive formula is ...
