Answer:
negative
Explanation:
Complementary goods have a negative cross-price elasticity because the increase in price of one tends to a weak or fall in consumer demand of the second. For instance, a hike in petrol will lead to a decrease in consumer demand for cars thereby giving rise to alternatives to these goods (most likely, there would be a surge in subway or rail patronage)
Answer:
$7.90
Explanation:
Calculation for lower bound on the current value of the European put option
Using this formula
Lower bound current value for European put option = Ke^–rt –So
Where,
Rf represent risk free rate 4%
K represent (Strike price) = $30
(t) represent Time = 1 month = 1/12 year
(So) represent Stock price = $22
Let plug in the formula
Lower bound current value for European put option = [30e^–0.04 x (1/12) ] – 22
Lower bound current value for European put option = $29.90 – $22
Lower bound current value for European put option = $7.90
Therefore the lower bound on the current value of the European put option will be $7.90
The main disadvantage of the valuation method is that the terminal value tends to dominate the total value in many cases.
In a free cash flow valuation, the intrinsic value equals present value of its free cash flow and thus, the net cash flow is left over for distribution to stockholders and debt-holders in each period.
- So, the disadvantage of the free cash flow valuation method is that the terminal value tends to dominate the total value in many cases.
Hence, the Option B is correct.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/22593826</em>
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
