Prior to closing, a final walk through of the property should be performed to ensure that everything has remained as stated in the sales contract. The walk through is generally completed by the: buyer
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
In real estate field final walk through refers to the inspection that is carried out finally before signing the documents. The local purchase and sales contract determines the time period at which the final walk through must be taken place. It helps the buyer to ensure the conditions to the property before signing the legal documents.
A final walk through helps a buyer to inspect whether all the things that are stated in the sales contract are fulfilled by the seller. Hence, it must be completed only by the buyer. If the seller has mentioned some modifications or repairs to be done then it should also be completed as per the stated requirements of the buyer.
Answer: When consideration is provided by one of the parties to the contract
Explanation:
Consideration must be given to make a contract legally binding.
Answer:
From this worksheet, I have noticed that following directions to receive your dream car is tricky as well as fun
;)
Answer: $242,567.27
Explanation:
The $5,000 is an annuity as it is being paid every year and is a constant amount.
The value in 19 years is the future value of this annuity:
Future value of annuity = Annuity * ( ( 1 + rate) ^ number of years - 1) / rate
= 5,000 * ( ( 1 + 9.5%)¹⁹ - 1) / 9.5%
= $242,567.27
Answer:
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Explanation:
Given in this case, Maxwell is applying "Universal Commercial Code (UCC)" division 2 provision, which defines all the goods and services.
A movable property, which can be sold from seller to the buyer at certain prices are called goods. Therefore, in this case, "Raw Cream" comes in the definition of goods, as it is directly sold to Maxwell by the grocery shop.
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
