All you have to do is:
Make all of your fractions to common denominator.
Then, you add 8 3/10-1 2/5- 2 1/3+ 4 3/5
And when you solve it, you get 9 5/30 and when you simplify it,
You get 9 1/6 yards of ribbon
600 is the answer. 600x10 is 6000
A probability of 0.075 corresponds to a z-score of about
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/218f3/218f364f0e31c370f9e40f885f3b47b3ee332cf0" alt="z\approx-1.44"
, i.e.
Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0899/d0899feaa1db8ae360fcb15a44bbdfd640b00b4c" alt="\mu = 15 \ months"
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61731/617317bc0105972f55a9a7cc01eb5cd895715a27" alt="\= x = 17 \ months"
The standard deviation is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1910/e1910cb7f3442c479701c316a5fcdcb2b28e245d" alt="s = 5.5 \ months"
Let assume the level of significance of this test is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa5f6/fa5f605c2e8f4c8780343ac02917e12fa8563090" alt="\alpha = 0.05"
The null hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfa6b/cfa6b546efad0b4f10e552d73110c1e90f8e5e76" alt="H_o : \mu = 15"
The alternative hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5925d/5925de2466896f28ea22944092292bf8459c0df8" alt="H_a : \mu > 17"
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2a1/da2a162eb8f3c354ec7c560c118fc4c4c4abbc00" alt="df = n -1"
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/037c9/037c90a0639c8b140a7f614cc44a2030d8291117" alt="df = 25 -1"
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27c54/27c545c0164602f0064b0ab31267f173725aaa9b" alt="df = 24"
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db75/0db750c02f2113d0c6ccd26baeb41b89de095c71" alt="t = \frac{\= x- \mu }{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }"
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/933a2/933a2dc7da024e183f993cd6e26faa68f83a6974" alt="t = \frac{ 17 - 15 }{\frac{5.5}{\sqrt{25} } }"
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f064a/f064a75247afdda3ba1198325fee194e30c7f5d6" alt="t = 1.8182"
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf44b/bf44bd4862ee2fea1a6a25f6eace382bcf76dfd7" alt="p-value = P(t > 0.18182 ) = 0.4286"
From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.