Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to write the equation of the line in point-slope form that goes through those points, we need to know the slope of that line. Therefore,
So the slope is 2. Now we'll pick a point and use it to write an equation in point-slope form. I'll use the first point given to see if that's the one used in any of the answers : (10, 5)
y - 5 = 2(x - 10). That's choice B. Let's see, just in case there are 2 answers to this, what the equation would be using the other point (4, -7):
y - (-7) = 2(x - 4) and simplified:
y + 7 = 2(x - 4) is the other equation. Since that's not a choice, the only answer is B
Hey there Smarty!
This would be considered to be a (acute angel) which in this case, we would have to make sure that this whole triangle would equal less than 270 because each angle would be less than
°
If we add/multiply
.
So, we would have to know that was ever this would all add up to be, this would have to be less than 270°
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\boxed{\boxed{(2.5+5) \\ \\ (2.5*2.5) \\ (2.5-2) \\ (2.5-1) \\}} \\ \\ this \ would \ be \ why \ I \ would \ say \\ that \ this \ would \ be \ the \ answer \end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Cboxed%7B%5Cboxed%7B%282.5%2B5%29%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%282.5%2A2.5%29%20%5C%5C%20%282.5-2%29%20%5C%5C%20%282.5-1%29%20%5C%5C%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20this%20%5C%20would%20%5C%20be%20%5C%20why%20%5C%20I%20%5C%20would%20%5C%20say%20%5C%5C%20that%20%5C%20this%20%5C%20would%20%5C%20be%20%5C%20the%20%5C%20answer%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%20)
I truly hope this helps, and also, it's kind of my
first time doing this I hope this would be helpful.
~Jurgen
Let's rewrite the expression as
So, if 
, you may divide both sides by 
, the equation becomes 
, and the only solution is 
, which means that this is not an identity (an indentity is tautologically true, no matter the value of x).
If instead 
, you are multiplying both sides by zero, so the equation becomes
So, it doesn't matter which value for x you choose, because you will always end up with 
, which is obviously always true.
Answer:
He would make $67.20 more a week if he got the increase.
Step-by-step explanation:
10% of $16.80 is $1.68. Add $1.68 to $16.80. You get $18.48. Multiply that by 40 hours. You get $739.20. Next, subtract $672 from $739.20. Your answer to that is how much more he'll make if he gets the increase.
So there’s something called the Triangle Inequality Theorem,
