1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alekssandra [29.7K]
3 years ago
10

At the end of the Cold War, why did communist states collapse?

History
1 answer:
Nadusha1986 [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

On the night of November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall—the most potent symbol of the cold-war division of Europe—came down. Earlier that day, the Communist authorities of the German Democratic Republic had announced the removal of travel restrictions to democratic West Berlin. Thousands of East Germans streamed into the West, and in the course of the night, celebrants on both sides of the wall began to tear it down.

The collapse of the Berlin Wall was the culminating point of the revolutionary changes sweeping East Central Europe in 1989. Throughout the Soviet bloc, reformers assumed power and ended over 40 years of dictatorial Communist rule. The reform movement that ended communism in East Central Europe began in Poland. Solidarity, an anti-Communist trade union and social movement, had forced Poland’s Communist government to recognize it in 1980 through a wave of strikes that gained international attention. In 1981, Poland’s Communist authorities, under pressure from Moscow, declared martial law, arrested Solidarity’s leaders, and banned the democratic trade union. The ban did not bring an end to Solidarity. The movement simply went underground, and the rebellious Poles organized their own civil society, separate from the Communist government and its edicts.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Interchangeable parts are pieces of any device that are guaranteed to fit with any device of the same type. How did interchangea
wel

Answer:

A. Interchangeable parts made mass production easier and cheaper.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Zinn's approach to the study of history? What does he suggest occurs when history is told as a story of human progress?
alina1380 [7]

Zinn said that study of history should be done from the point of view of the common man. It should not be done from the point of view of the historians or the politicians.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Zinn thought that the way we study history is very boring and that we have been bent under the heavy weight of the history books which lean up on us. They have set from the point of view of the historians and the politicians. This makes it very boring for us to read this subject.

History should rather be studied from the point of view of the common man so that they can understand it better because through this way they can related to it in a better way. When it is told in the form of a story, the interest of the people increases.

5 0
3 years ago
5. In what way was Reagan able to influence national policy decades after he was no longer president?
nata0808 [166]
The answer is His <span>appointment of three Supreme Court justices
Reagan's appointment for the supreme court justices marked a historical event in united states history because he chooses Sandra Day O'Connor, which is the first female Supreme Court Justice in history, who carried out many of Reagan's ideology.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
A car dealer earns a 4% commission on all cars.last month he earned 7,200 in commission
sveta [45]
What is the question?
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following accurately describes a major difference between the western Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire?
anyanavicka [17]

One major difference was A: The Byzantine government clearly placed the emperor as the highest religious authority, while the Roman government kept political and religious authority more separate.

<h3>How did the Byzantines differ from the western Romans?</h3>

The Western Romans had the Pope as the head of the church and the emperor as the head of the empire thereby keeping both offices separate.

The Byzantines on the other hand, had their emperor as both the head of the empire, and the head of the church.

Find out more on the Byzantine empire at brainly.com/question/1446842

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why is it important for historians to use a good quality source?
    13·2 answers
  • 3) Where was the first Dutch colony in New Netherlands? What city is that region a part of today?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the United States and the Soviet Union during World War 117
    5·2 answers
  • Please help me!!!!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Which attorney general created a "red scare" in 1920 by arrested 5,000 suspected communists and anarchists who were held without
    8·2 answers
  • What represents the right side of the economy?
    12·1 answer
  • Question 13 of 20
    9·1 answer
  • Barbed wire and windmills were new technologies in which Wild West profession?
    14·1 answer
  • ANSWER NOWWWWWWWWW WIll MARK bRIANLIEST
    7·2 answers
  • What happened during the Venezuelan crisis?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!