Police must obtain a warrant to monitor telephone calls.
Option A
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
The Supreme Court of America has made and landmark judgements in electronic surveillance like tapping phone calls and accessing the phone records.
It stated that without a proper warrant if the police department carry out electronic surveillance means it amounts to be illegal, it is a breach of privacy of individuals.
So, the top court has issued guidelines before proceeding with the electronic surveillance. This judgement of preserving the right of the individual is considered to be the major policy decision taken by the court.
The investigative process is a progression of activities or steps moving from evidence gathering tasks, to information analysis, to theory development and validation, to forming reasonable ground to believe, and finally to the arrest and charge of a suspect.
Answer:
- move for a new trial—that is, ask the judge to set aside the jury’s verdict, declare a mistrial, and start over, or
- appeal or seek a writ, which means asking a higher court to reverse a conviction (court of appeal)
- could possibly hire a private detective to review the case to see if there is any evidence to show he is innocent, if this is successful, a retrial can be put in place?
Explanation:
Answer= Due process
I took civics
D because if u check it you can ensure it stays high
