Tim ate 5/7 of a cake . ket ate 7/11 of a cake. who ate more cake ? how much more?
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The missing measurement is 9 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The Area of a parallelogram is equal to
where
b is the length of any base
h is the corresponding altitude
The altitude (or height) of a parallelogram is the perpendicular distance from the base to the opposite side (which may have to be extended).
In the figure, the altitude corresponding to the base is 4 miles
substitute
Solve for b
Divide by 4 both sides
therefore
The missing measurement is 9 miles
Answer:
a. Yes
b. Yes
c. Yes
d. Degree 8
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Yes, n(x) is a polynomial of one single term (also called monomial) because it contains variables raised to positive integers.
b. Yes, m(x) is a polynomial of also one single term (also called monomial) because it contains variables raised to positive integers.
c. The quotient of n(x) / m(x) can be reduced to a polynomial of one single term as follows:
which as can be seen, also contains variables raised to positive integers.
d. The degree of the polynomial resultant is the addition of the powers of all variables present (x and y) which results in: 2 + 6 = 8
Therefore the degree of this polynomial is 8.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You know how subtraction is the <em>opposite of addition </em>and division is the <em>opposite of multiplication</em>? A logarithm is the <em>opposite of an exponent</em>. You know how you can rewrite the equation 3 + 2 = 5 as 5 - 3 = 2, or the equation 3 × 2 = 6 as 6 ÷ 3 = 2? This is really useful when one of those numbers on the left is unknown. 3 + _ = 8 can be rewritten as 8 - 3 = _, 4 × _ = 12 can be rewritten as 12 ÷ 4 = _. We get all our knowns on one side and our unknown by itself on the other, and the rest is computation.
We know that ; as a logarithm, the <em>exponent</em> gets moved to its own side of the equation, and we write the equation like this:
, which you read as "the logarithm base 3 of 9 is 2." You could also read it as "the power you need to raise 3 to to get 9 is 2."
One historical quirk: because we use the decimal system, it's assumed that an expression like uses <em>base 10</em>, and you'd interpret it as "What power do I raise 10 to to get 1000?"
The expression means "the power you need to raise 10 to to get 100 is x," or, rearranging: "10 to the x is equal to 100," which in symbols is
.
(If we wanted to, we could also solve this: , so
)