1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
3 years ago
15

Write an equation for each sentence 13 times the sum of a number and 5 is 91 I

Mathematics
1 answer:
Volgvan3 years ago
7 0

Answer:13( n + 5) = 91

Step-by-step explanation: solve the parenthesis first and then multiply that by 13

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP I WILL PICK BRAINLIEST
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

A more complex question has rarely been asked.

Principia Mathematica took nearly a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2. It does meander a bit, but had they wanted to prove 1+1=2 alone, it could have done so in 500 pages.

Mathematically speaking, the definition of 1 is:

There exists a number such that when multiplied upon an element of a specified set, yields the element of the specified set.

It is also defined as:

1.0000000000000000000000…

.9999999999999999999999999…

as the set of all singletons.

a singleton is a set with exactly 1 element.

These 4 definitions work in tandem with one another.

For example:

1=1

Divide both sides by 3.

1/3=1/3

Rewrite.

1/3=.33333333333333333...

Multiply both sides by 3.

1=.9999999999999999999...

Similarly:

If    =.9999999999999999999...

10=9.99999999999999999...

10=9+.99999999999999...

10=9+

Simplify by subtracting x from both sides.

9=9

=1

.99999999999999999999...=1

As the set of all singletons, 1 is also THE element that represents the set of all single entities.

That is to say: if you have 7 erasers. What you really have is a set of 7 single entities. The definition of 7 becomes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; and not as is commonly believed as: 6 + 1.

There is an argument for 7 to be defined as 6 + 1, but this argument is a corollary of the Peano Axioms which in turn argues that there exists a set with absolutely nothing in it {} and a set with exactly something in it {x}. More on this later.

The Principia Mathematica uses Peano's (from the Peano Axioms mentioned earlier) work and notation to expertly slice through the many nuances pertaining to this question.

This is something we will not do; but hopefully, we will also be able to effectively demonstrate why 1 + 1 = 2 in less than 1000 pages.

We will assume these basic principles of number theory:

There exists a number such that when multiplied to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

There exists a number such that when added to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

If we again assume to have only two sets, a set that is empty: {} containing no elements, and a set that is not empty {x} containing an element. We realize that Consequently, we went from nothing {}, to something {x}. This means that {x} is the successor to {}, as the next step up from nothing, is something.

As such we now have two elements:

Nothing, {}, and something that comes after {}, this something is called the successor, and it is the Successor of nothing.

in written notation we have:

{} and { the Successor of nothing }

Rewritten:

{0, the thing that comes after 0}

Further reworded:

{0, Successor (0) }

Reduced further:

0,(0)

Where S(0) stands in place of ‘the successor’. Further, we know there are an infinite number of possible Natural numbers, and we get:

{0, Successor of 0, the successor of the successor of 0, the successor of the successor of the successor of 0,…}

Further reduced:

0,(0),((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

Further explained:

We know that we had nothing, and added something to it, and got something:

Nothing + Something = Successor of nothing.

0+__=(0)

We also know that there is nothing closer to 0, than the thing that comes after 0.

0+(0)=(0)

This implies that S(0) is the smallest increment possible from natural number to next natural number.

As a consequence, we now have two discovered entities: Something, and Nothing.

Let’s give them names.

We have decided that

Nothing = 0 .

0 = Nothing.

S(0) is the something that comes after nothing.

We define a new symbol: 1, to be: 1 = S(0)

This is to say that 1 IS the symbol that succeeds 0;

We could have drawn any shape to define the number that succeeds 0; we chose to draw a 1.

0+(0)=(0)

0+1=(0)

0+1=1

0,1,((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

We now have definitions for 0, and 1. What about a definition for the thing that comes after one? The successor of 1?

As we know S(0) is the smallest increment available, and we are interested in finding S(0)’s successor we investigate:

The successor to the successor of Nothing:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)

This reads:

The successor of the successor of nothing IS the successor of one

And now… we need a new symbol.

We define the

(1)=2

The successor of 1 IS 2.

Thus:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)=2

Simplify:

0+1=1;1+1=(1);(1)=2.

Further:

0+1=1;1+1=2;2=2.

1 has many different properties; but all of the properties and their resulting definitions have little to do with why 1 + 1 = 2. And that 1 + 1 = 2 is a byproduct of properties inherent to Natural numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
If m^2 − n^2 = 117, where m and n are prime numbers, find m and n.
astraxan [27]

Step-by-step explanation:

subtract

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which area 100 km or 60km
rewona [7]

Answer:

100km

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A box can hold a maximum of 8 cans. You have 50 cans to put in boxes. What is the smallest number of boxes you need to store all
xeze [42]

Answer:

7boxes

Step-by-step explanation:

A box can hold a maximum of 8 cans

You have a total of 50 cans

The problem here is to determine the minimum number of boxes that can hold the 50 cans

Let the minimum number of boxes = y

The minimum required will be such that:

The Product of The number of cans X Number of Required boxes ≥50

8y≥50

y≥50/8

y≥6.25

Since a box have a fractional value, the minimum number of boxes required to store 50 cans will be the nearest whole number which in this case is 7.

3 0
3 years ago
Name the property that the statement illustrates.
densk [106]

Answer:

Reflexive Property of Equality

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • DeSean throws a ball up with an initial vertical velocity of 30 ft/s from a platform that is at ground level. How long will the
    6·2 answers
  • The width of bergstroms dining room table is three feet shorter then the length. If the area of the tabletop is 28 square feet,
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I've tried solving this so many times I don't understand!
    6·1 answer
  • Two punds of cheese cost 8.40. show the cost of 1,2,3,and 4 pumds of cheese. Is there a direct variation
    11·1 answer
  • Explain a line with a positive slope
    7·1 answer
  • What are three reasons for using a mann-whitney u test?​
    14·1 answer
  • What is the difference between a subset and a proper subset?
    9·1 answer
  • Plz answer I really need it
    6·1 answer
  • Simplify -2√-45 please
    15·2 answers
  • Indicate whether each system of equations has no solution, one solution, or infinitely many solutions. y=2x+2y=2x+4
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!