1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksano4ka [1.4K]
3 years ago
15

The right of citizens of the United States to votes shall not be denied or abridged by the

History
1 answer:
JulsSmile [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It is from the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Because of this amendment, the voting rights of women are protected because a prior related amendment failed to include gender.

Explanation:

This text comes from the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment was a step forward when it came to protecting the rights of women. The Amendment prohibited the states, as well as the federal government from denying citizens the right to vote based on their sex.  This is one of the most important amendments when it comes to the universality of civil rights in the United States.

(hmu if you need more help!)

You might be interested in
PLZ HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST.............. Read the passage, then decide whether each statement is true or false.
jolli1 [7]

Answer:

True

False

True

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write one solid paragraph in which you support or defend national government having all of the power in a system of government.P
Svetach [21]

Answer:So long as their laws do not contradict national laws, state governments can prescribe policies on commerce, taxation, healthcare, education, and many other issues within their state. Notably, both the states and the federal government have the power to tax, make and enforce laws, charter banks, and borrow money.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Name two African American athletes who
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

Joe Louis: Joe Louis held the heavyweight title for 140 consecutive months, the longest such streak in boxing history. Many people regarded him as the first black national hero. He also fought two internationally publicized bouts.

Jesse Owens: During the 1936 Berlin Olympics, Adolf Hitler attempted to use the Games as a showcase for his Third Reich and the supposed superiority of the Aryan race.

After winning the Olympics, some of the personal aspects of his discrimination were slowly released. Owens could then eat the all-white restaurants, and travel with the whites as well. But this didn’t happen all at once. In fact, his National achievements were still looked down upon. Whether being the most successful man in the world, Owens was still a black man, and black men were only seen through the eyes of the white as slaves. However, keep in mind, that it was quite rare for black people to be granted this right.

Happy learning!

--Applepi101

3 0
3 years ago
What was the verdict handed down on John Scopes?
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

In Dayton, Tennessee, the so-called Scopes Monkey Trial begins with John Thomas Scopes, a young high school science teacher, accused of teaching evolution in violation of a Tennessee state law.

The law, which had been passed in March, made it a misdemeanor punishable by fine to “teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.” With local businessman George Rappleyea, Scopes had conspired to get charged with this violation, and after his arrest the pair enlisted the aid of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to organize a defense. Hearing of this coordinated attack on Christian fundamentalism, William Jennings Bryan, the three-time Democratic presidential candidate and a fundamentalist hero, volunteered to assist the prosecution. Soon after, the great attorney Clarence Darrow agreed to join the ACLU in the defense, and the stage was set for one of the most famous trials in U.S. history.

CHECK OUT: Rare Footage of the Scopes Monkey Trial  

On July 10, the Monkey Trial got underway, and within a few days hordes of spectators and reporters had descended on Dayton as preachers set up revival tents along the city’s main street to keep the faithful stirred up. Inside the Rhea County Courthouse, the defense suffered early setbacks when Judge John Raulston ruled against their attempt to prove the law unconstitutional and then refused to end his practice of opening each day’s proceeding with prayer.

Outside, Dayton took on a carnival-like atmosphere as an exhibit featuring two chimpanzees and a supposed “missing link” opened in town, and vendors sold Bibles, toy monkeys, hot dogs, and lemonade. The missing link was in fact Jo Viens of Burlington, Vermont, a 51-year-old man who was of short stature and possessed a receding forehead and a protruding jaw. One of the chimpanzees–named Joe Mendi–wore a plaid suit, a brown fedora, and white spats, and entertained Dayton’s citizens by monkeying around on the courthouse lawn.

In the courtroom, Judge Raulston destroyed the defense’s strategy by ruling that expert scientific testimony on evolution was inadmissible–on the grounds that it was Scopes who was on trial, not the law he had violated. The next day, Raulston ordered the trial moved to the courthouse lawn, fearing that the weight of the crowd inside was in danger of collapsing the floor.

In front of several thousand spectators in the open air, Darrow changed his tactics and as his sole witness called Bryan in an attempt to discredit his literal interpretation of the Bible. In a searching examination, Bryan was subjected to severe ridicule and forced to make ignorant and contradictory statements to the amusement of the crowd. On July 21, in his closing speech, Darrow asked the jury to return a verdict of guilty in order that the case might be appealed. Under Tennessee law, Bryan was thereby denied the opportunity to deliver the closing speech he had been preparing for weeks. After eight minutes of deliberation, the jury returned with a guilty verdict, and Raulston ordered Scopes to pay a fine of $100, the minimum the law allowed. Although Bryan had won the case, he had been publicly humiliated and his fundamentalist beliefs had been disgraced. Five days later, on July 26, he lay down for a Sunday afternoon nap and never woke up.

In 1927, the Tennessee Supreme Court overturned the Monkey Trial verdict on a technicality but left the constitutional issues unresolved until 1968, when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a similar Arkansas law on the grounds that it violated the First Amendment.

Citation Information

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was Tammany Hall?
Bogdan [553]
The answer is B. A powerful political machine
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • This term refers to the overall decrease in the price of goods and services
    10·2 answers
  • Please help please please
    12·1 answer
  • MAKE A FLOW CHART FOR SCIENTISTS AND THEIR INVENTIONS
    5·1 answer
  • List of school shootings in america 2012-2015
    9·1 answer
  • How long did the siege last
    14·2 answers
  • Who was sent to serve as governor of jamestown in 1610
    9·2 answers
  • What were the major difficulties in uniting ancient greeks under a single government were caused?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the approximate distance between Bolan Pass and Khyber Pass?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the role of the Supreme court in the US government?
    8·1 answer
  • You are writing an argumentative essay about whether the New Deal effectively relieved suffering during the Depression. Your ess
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!