Sometimes, when people suffer wrong in the hands of others, they hold on to it, till they eventually explode. This form of conflict where Bernie remembers insults and times he's been ignored by his family, then after a few days, he explodes telling about all these verbal and nonverbal injuries, is called:
Gunnysacking is a form of conflict where a person does not immediately address issues when offended. He rather holds them in till a point where they can no longer control themselves.
They explode and take people by surprise because others had believed that all was well with them.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/14093875
Answer:
Woodall Mountain is the highest point in Mississippi with 806 feet above the sea level
Answer:
Spanish remained hostile to the native groups as they considered to be uncivilized.
English avoided contact with the native groups, but that changed as the Native Indians helped them in settling in the New World.
French from the beginning remains friendly with the native as they relied on the fur trade.
Explanation:
French had a better relationship with the Native American compare to the other colonists in the New World. They kept a respectful relationship by signing treaties. French took furs pelts and in return gave manufactured goods like utensils, textiles, and weapons to the Native American.
Spanish had a very hostile relationship with the Native groups. Spaniards came to capture the land and make money for the emperor.
British at the beginning had a good bond with the Natives as they depend on there help for survival.
Answer:
Groupthink
Explanation:
Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon which occurs when members of a certain group decided to conform to the majority opinion/perspective held by the group even if it contradicts their own personal belief.
Typically, groupthink is caused by inherent desire to avoid being regarded as an outcasts by other members of the group. So rather than saying different opinion and distort the harmony within the group, they decided to bow down to the group's view and create an illusion of unanimity.
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.