Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
$2,896 is needed
Explanation:
external financing needed = net income - working capital needs - capital expenditures + retained earnings
- net income = $1,560 x 1.2 = $1,872
- working capital needs = ($4,700 x 1.2) - ($860 x 1.2) = $5,640 - $1,032 = $4,608
- capital expenditures = fixed assets x 20% = $940
- retained earnings = $1,560 x 50% = $780
external financing needed = $1,872 - $4,608 - $940 + $780 = -$2,896
Answer:
Confront theories predictions with evidence
Explanation:
To test economic theories, economists would observe real behavior and test it with data from the real world. Which would in turn provide evidence based on what is being tested. Confronting theories predictions with evidence is a pointer to the fact that economic theories are verifiable and their validity can be tested.
Expected rate of return is defined as the amount of money an individual gets on investment.
<h3>What is expected return?</h3>
The expected return is the amount of profit or addition on money invested that an individual who is an investor is expected to get after a periods of time on the investment.
Therefore, expected rate of return is defined as the amount of money an individual gets on investment.
Learn more on rate of return below
brainly.com/question/16725994
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option A) .
Explanation:
One way in which firms identify customer is through observational characteristics which can be age, by knowing the average of their target customers , a firm can know whether their target customers would be willing to wait in long lines or not for getting the firms product. As if their target customers mainly consists of old age then those customer won't be willing to wait in long lines to get the product.
