Answer:
The correct answer is option A
a. Raise real GDP per person and productivity in Lawrencia
Explanation:
GDP per capita shows the GDP per person in a country and is calculated as GDP/population.
A high GDP per capita shows the progress and productivity of the country. Therefore for a long lasting effect in Lawrencia, the GDP per person will increase progressively as well as productivity.
Answer: b. people face trade-offs
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Bullie Jean has $120 to spend and wants to buy cither a new amplifier for her guitar or a new mp3 player to listen to music while working out.
We are further informed that the amplifier and the mp3 player cost $120, each and so she can only buy one. This shows that people face trade offs and have to make a choice regarding some decisions. Here, an opportunity cost will be the one that she didn't buy at the expense of the other.
Answer:
my baby daddy.
Explanation:
I forgot to take the pill :(
Here is the answer. When excess demand exists for tickets to a major sporting event or a concert, profit opportunities exist for scalpers because they do work efficiently because they allow ticket prices, especially those in high demand to reach an equilibrium by supplying those who want a ticket at market price allowing them to get one, and by allowing those with utilities below the market price to <span>sell them. With their help, no tickets would be gone to waste. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
