Answer:
1. 2) Fishermen report low catch of species for eating.
Fishermen will first report that they were unable to catch much fish.
2. 3) Public hearings are held to determine all the possible solutions.
There will then be a public hearing where the possible reasons and solutions to the fish problem are discussed.
3. 4)Marine scientists count fish population.
As part of the solution, marine scientists will count the populations of fish in the water.
4. 5)The Department of Fish and Game evaluates the repopulation of fisheries.
Based on this count, the Department of Fish and Game will research to find out how they can repopulate the water bodies.
5. Department of Fish and Game sets limits for fishermen.
As a result of this research, the Department will come up with a limit on the amount of fish that can be caught in a particular period to enable to fish population to rise to a certain level again.
Can you explain this differently so i can answer it ?
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
