Answer:
B) ethical fundamentalism
Explanation:
A government or political party that strictly derives its ethics and laws based on a specific religious book is an example of <u>ethical fundamentalism</u>. Ethical fundamentalism asserts that the ultimate moral guide is a supreme rule gotten from external sources or central figures such as the Bible and Quran. It involves relying on external sources or central figure for ethical rules.
Answer:
political system, terrorist attacks, forced labour
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
In this scenario while taking two psychology courses of cognition and learning and are giving midterm exams tomorrow. Once you finished studying for your cognition test, and are attempting to study for the learning exam. While you find it difficult to recall the material on learning; you are experiencing proactive interference. It refers to the interference which effect of previously learned materials on the acquisition and retrieval of newer materials. If we take an example in today's life it could be the difficulty in remembering a friend's new phone number after having previously learned the old number.
The appropriate response is heart rates. A typical resting heart rate for grown-ups ranges from 60 to 100 pulsates a moment. By and large, a lower heart rate very still infers more productive heart capacity and better cardiovascular wellness. For instance, an all around prepared competitor may have an ordinary resting heart rate more like 40 thumps a moment.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
