Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
C. Expenditures
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the Parks Department should use an expenditures account to record these billings. Expenditures refers to the action of spending funds to purchase goods or services on behalf of the company. Such purchases can include vehicle rentals like what was billed for the Parks Department.
Answer:
the type of product affects the buying conclusions that a person makes
Answer:
The correct answer is: Cost-Plus Pricing Strategy.
Explanation:
To begin with, a ''Cost-Plus'' is the name that a pricing strategy receives in the field of marketing and business that mainly focuses on the pricing of a product by the cost of it plus a certain porcentage of benefit, considering this last one as the benefit margin. Moreover, this type of pricing strategy is one of the most common ones in the field, typically the businesses use this type of pricing strategy due to the fact that it is easy to establish and it does not consider complex terms.
Secondly, in this case where the manager notices such a difference in the prices of the two cans is due to the fact that the manufacturer put less commodities and less effort in the can of 16-ounce rather than in the other can of 32-ounce where there is more soup and therefore there is more cost in that can, establishing that a higher price must put in that one.
Answer:
$380
Explanation:
Ziva's total cost of farming is composed of two different costs: explicit and implicit costs.
Explicit cost is an out-of-pocket cost that a person incurs to carry out a particular business activity. It is sort of, a business-related expense for which the business pays. In Ziva's case, it is $130, the cost of the seeds
Implicit costs are opportunity costs. An opportunity cost refers the benefits an individual, investor or business misses out on when opting for one alternative in preference of another. In our case, it amounts to $250($25*10 hours)
Thus, Ziva's cost of farming
= $130 +( $25*10) = $130 +$250 = $380
