Answer:
1. 1/2
2. 1/2
3. 1/4
Explanation:
Let the allele for freckles be A or a while that of dimples be B or b.
A person without freckles but heterozygous for dimples = aaBb
A person who has freckles (whose mother has no freckles) but no dimples = Aabb
aaBb x Aabb
Offspring
4 AaBb - freckled and dimpled
4 Aabb - freckled and non dimpled
4 aaBb - non freckled and dimpled
4 aabb - non freckled and non dimpled
1. <em>Probability that the parents will have a dimpled child</em> = 8/16 or 1/2
2. <em>Probability that they will have a child with freckles</em> = 8/16 or 1/2
3. <em>Probability that they will have a child with freckles and dimples</em> = 4/16 or 1/4
<u>See the attached image for the Punnet's square analysis of the cross</u>
Hello!
An initial observation is the first thing a scientist notices about a topic before conducting the experiment. We can see that it is the first thing in the paragraph in this case, that dandelions grow as unwanted weeds in many lawns.
The hypothesis is the guess about the result of an experiment made before the experiment is conducted. In this case, it is that a weed killer (Killimal) would kill all the dandelions while leaving the grass healthy. This is not specifically a guess made by the scientist, but more like a prediction he wanted to verify.
An independent variable is the variable being changed in the experiment by the scientist. Here, it is whether Killimal was sprayed or not.
The dependent variable is the variable being measured, and the one being affected by the independent variable. His observation would be whether the grass and dandelions would be killed. This is because the weed killer would be directly affecting whether or not these would be killed.
The control variables are ones which are kept the same in the experiment as to not interfere with the final results. In this case, it would be the density of dandelions, the amount of sunlight, and the amount the plants were watered. These were kept exactly the same, as they could've affected the dependent variable if changed.
The control group was the one that is not impacted by the independent variable. The control group makes sure that it actually is the independent variable affecting the dependent, and it isn't some outside unknown variable. This would be the plot without the Killimal.
The experimental group is the one being experimented on from the independent variable. This would be the plot with the Killimal.
Hope this helps!
<span>The question above is incomplete, the remaining part of the question is given below:
1. Since more offspring are produced
than an environment can support, organisms within a population must compete for
resources to survive.
2. Due to variations within the population, some competitors will be better
equipped for survival than others.
3. The best-equipped organisms will survive and will produce well-equipped
offspring.
4. Variations that help with survival will be passed on to future generations
and will rapidly change the whole population.
Which point is flawed as written above?
A. point 1
B. point 2
C. point 3
D. point 4</span>
ANSWER
The correct option is D.
All the options written above about Darwin's theory are quite correct with the exception of option D. Charles Darwin was the scientist who proposed the theory of evolution by mean of natural selection. Darwin submitted that, due to the scarcity of needed resources in an environment, it is only the fittest individuals in a particular population that will be able to survive and produce offspring that share their adaptability features. As this continue from generation to generation, it leads to evolution, which is defined as the changes overtime, which give rise to new species that share a common ancestors. Contrary to the point made in option D, evolution by natural selection is not a rapid process at all, it is a process that occur over a long period of time.
Answer:
They are all built of chemically linked monomers.
Answer:
The options
A)hippocampus
B)basal ganglia
C)hypothalamus
D)cerebellum
The CORRECT ANSWER IS D)
D)cerebellum
Explanation:
Apart from the coordinating process, the cerebellum is involved in motor learning, emotional behavior, and fear memory.
Fear learning is widely shown in the variation of autonomic and somatic responses, as in heart rate and freezing, promoted by a neutral stimulus which could have been formally grouped with a painful one.
Variation or changes of the vermis influences these responses, and its reversible inactivation in the period of consolidation which is seen to impair fear memory.
The neural correlate of cerebellar activities in fear consolidation is shown by a behaviorally promoted long-term rise of synaptic effectiveness and efficiencies among parallel fibers and a Purkinje cell.
Likely synaptic variations after fear conditioning are well fully observed in the amygdala and hippocampus, suggesting an interplay among emotional circumstances of scenario and the different variations in neural process.
Furthermore, in hotfoot mice, that shows a basic lack of parallel fiber to Purkinje cell synapse, short- and long-term fear memories are influenced.
All these data gives a foundational background on the concept that the cerebellum is majorly involved in fear learning.
The functional interplay of the vermis with hypothalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus do infer to a more complex activities of the cerebellum as a form of an united network that basically influences emotional behavior.
