The judicial branch does that
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
Answer:
Here are several reasons for that:
- Every society's population contains a lot of genetic mixture,
- Various racial categories are genetically very much alike,
- The skin color of Caucasian people ranges from very light to very dark.
Explanation:
The fact that there are a large number of similarities between people form different races and varieties between people from same race indicates that there are very little difference between races. (approximately, people form different races only has around 6% of genetic difference)
From the social perspective, differentiating and the racial difference tend to lead to tribalism that make groups of a certain race believe that the others are inferior compared to them. This will increase the risk of conflicts.
