Answer:
An economic system is any system of allocating scarce resources. Economic systems answer three basic questions: what will be produced, how will it be produced, and how will the output society produces be distributed?
There are two extremes of how these questions get answered. In command economies, decisions about both allocation of resources and allocation of production and consumption are decided by the government. In market economies, there is private ownership of resources—established though property rights—and the factors of production and consumption are all coordinated through markets. In a market system, resources are allocated to their most productive use through prices that are determined in markets. These prices act as a signal for buyers and sellers. Most economies are mixed economies that lie between these two extremes.
In either system, a rational agent would allocate resources and production using marginal analysis. In command economies, this is more difficult to do because without markets, prices fail at being an effective signal.
Thank you and please rate me as brainliest as it will help me to level up
The correct answers are A) to assist the U.S. companies as they trade, D) to help business to create exports, and E) to create trade opportunities for U.S. companies.
<em>According to the website, the purpose of the ITA is to assist the U.S. companies as they trade, to help business to create exports, and to create trade opportunities for U.S. companies.
</em>
The International Trade Administration was created to support the competitiveness of the United States industry. ITA promotes investment and trade. It procures fair trade applying the rules and regulations in the trade agreements. One of the goals of ITA is that the business of the United States can compete fairly in local markets as well as international markets.
ITA is comprised of three departments. The Industry and Analysis department, the Enforce and Compliance department, and the Global Markets department.
Answer:
The correct answer is c.) The bystander effect
Explanation:
In social pshychology, The bystander effect is a claim that individuals when they are in group, or surrounded by many people are less likely to help a victim in a situation of need, the greater the number of bystanders the less likely it is that one will provide help. In this case, Mr. Hughes decided not to do something or to help the swimmer exactly becasue of this, he figured out one of the other bystanders would provide the help required by the swimmer, therefore his reaction reflects very clearly the Bystander Effect.
He was suspected of being a soviet spy
Answer:
FIRST: You had tell the person that you were going to start an action against them to be heard in "court". You had to bring witnesses with you so your witnesses could testify that the person was told why you were bringing an action, and that you had given this person a date, time, and location that they had to appear in court to defend themselves.
SECOND: You had to post a written notice near the courthouse that clearly stated the names of both parties, the charges, and the date, time, and location of your first trip to court on this action.
FIRST TIME IN COURT: The first trip gave both parties a chance to speak before a judge. If the judge felt there was enough cause, that judge would assign a trial date. That trial date had to be posted as well.
JURY SELECTION, TRIAL BY JURY: To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age. You had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get paid. Juries were selected from volunteers. The number of jurors could be huge. Some trials had as many as 500 jurors who had volunteered to judge a case. Only the jury could bring in a decision that someone was guilty or innocent. The judge only kept order, but could not decide a trial outcome.
THE TRIAL: Both sides presented their case. Then the jurors voted. Majority ruled.
PUNISHMENT: Punishments varied. If found guilty, both sides, the person bringing the charge and the person being charged, suggested a punishment. The jury could not choose a third choice. They had to choice one suggestion or the other.
Explanation:
