What has happened to a subject when it responds naturally to a stimulus that
wouldn't typically cause that response.
A subject has been <u>conditioned</u> when it responds naturally to a stimulus that
wouldn't typically cause that response.
- Conditioning is the process of modifying a person or animal's behaviour. It involves continuous preparation and training to instill such behavior in an animal or human.
There are two types of conditioning:
- Classical conditioning: This is the process of associating a response and a stimulus involuntarily. There is no reward for the learner.
- Operant conditioning: This is the process of associating a response and a stimulus voluntarily. There is reward for the learner.
Therefore, subject has been <u>conditioned</u> when it responds naturally to a stimulus that wouldn't typically cause that response.
Read more:
brainly.com/question/1213898
Hey there!
Your answer is D, Hector P. Garcia.
In 1984, president Ronald Reagon presented Garcia with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He founded the American GI Forum, was a World War 2 veteran, and on top of all this, was even a medical surgeon. He made many medical contributions to society and served our country. He was truly a man who dedicated his life to the well-being of others.
Hope this helps, and be sure to come to me with any other questions!
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The size of state’s population</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>Virginia plan basically set forward the proposition of the idea of population weighted representation. </em>
It was proposed by the then Governor of Virginia Edmond Randolph and constitutes proposition for the bicameral legislature where members will based on the quota according to the weighted population of the state.
This plan also set forward the concept of government with three branches with check and balance to resist the abuse of power from any of these governing branches. <em>This plan was not appreciated by the small states with less population.</em>
Answer:
The endowment effect.
Explanation:
The endowment effect is the reluctancy to sell or throw away an object they own opposed to acquiring the same object if they do not own it. In this case, Mark is reluctant to sell his car. Even if it meant great significance to him or not, he would not buy the same model if he hadn't had it in the first place. He would buy another one, according to this theory.