The ~unequal~ statuses of different individuals in a society. for example, a doctor has a higher social status than a janitor working at the same hospital. the doctor might be awarded for his work, while the janitor is mostly ignored. the doctor may also have come from a fairly wealthy family and received a good education, while the janitor may have had economic disadvantages and a poor quality education. so the doctor and the janitor are socially unequal. social inequality is very closely connected to economic inequality, so if you ever see the phrase "socio-economic inequality," that's why.
Answer:
Yes, because from the movie, it appears that we cannot so easily delineate what it is and what it isn’t to be human, except through testing (which would be scientific in approach
Explanation:
Blade Runner is a movie which is an adaptation of a science fiction novel by Phillip K.D titled "Do Andrôids Dream of Electric Sheep?" set in the year 2019.
Blade Runner’s most philosophically questions centered around what it means to be human, how do we define ourselves as humans? Do we define ourselves solely on the biological characteristics, or is there something more that makes a human?
Hence, from the movie, the replicants shows most of the characteristics of human, especially in intelligence and empathy, but not biologically.
Therefore, it can be concluded that, we cannot so easily separate what it is and what it is not to be human, except through testing (which would be scientific in approach).
Answer:
the same amount of energy is transferred to the air at both locations
Explanation:
Alesund and Khatyrka are the same distance from the equator and they are both near the ocean. ... They are both near moving ocean water, so the same amount of energy is transferred to the air at both locations. warmer than Khatyrka. At Alesund, energy is transferred from the ocean to the air.
He trys to keep everything calm and collected between all the kids after one of them goes missing
Answer:
R→ M
W→M
Therefore
R→W
See truth table in the attachment
Arguement is valid as it is always true as a whole.
Explanation:
logical statement
(R→M) ^ (W→M) → (R→W)
Based on the results in truth table, as the argument always holds true it is a valid arguement
