The belief that human behavior, as well as nonhuman animal behavior, can be partly explained as the outcome of natural selection
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
Answer: $15,000
Explanation:
From the question, Carl transfers land with a fair market value of $120,000 and basis of $30,000, to a new corporation in exchange for 85 percent of the corporation's stock and that the land is subject to a $45,000 liability, which the corporation assumes.
The amount of gain that Carl must recognize as a result of this transaction will be the difference between the liability the land is subjected to which is $45,000 and the basis of the land which is $30,000.
= $45,000 - $30,000
= $15,000
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Given that
Total revenue is $70,000
Total fixed cost is $40,000
And, the total variable cost is $10,000
According to the given situation, the computation of profit is shown below:-
Profit = Total Revenue - Total Fixed cost - Total variable cost
= $70,000 - (10,000 × $4) - 10,000
= $70,000 - 40,000 - 10,000
= $10,000
Therefore for computing the profit we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
B. Spending by firms on capital goods is declining.
