1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marizza181 [45]
3 years ago
11

Why is misty Copeland famous?

Social Studies
1 answer:
dimaraw [331]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

for his good work among the society

You might be interested in
Razia was appointed the sultan because she was more able and qualified than all her brothers. Yet she was dethroned after 4 year
Lorico [155]

Gender-equality will help make a society wealthier, improve freedom, strengthen families, improve democracy, promote peace, reduce violence and increase the odds of satisfying orgasms.

Settle down and I’ll tell you more about it.

Filling roles with the person who is best qualified rather than the person who is best qualified and the “right” gender means on the average getting better qualified people. Relative to a strictly gender-segregated society a gender-equal one has twice the talent-pool available for all jobs.

Gender-equality increases freedom since it gives individuals the freedom to do anything they want to do, rather than limit them arbitrarily to a subset of activities judged “appropriate” for their gender.

Gender-equality increases the resilience and flexibility of families. In a family with strict gender-roles odds are only the husband has a income, and only the wife has experience and expertise in handling household-chores. A gender-equal family in contrast frequently has 2 adults who both have a income and are both able to take competently care of the household. This makes them a lot better equipped to handle life’s curve-balls.

Gender-equality strengthens democracy. The entire point of Democracy is that the people hold the ultimate power in a society. It should be fairly obvious why excluding half of humanity from equal participation in running society by necessity weakens democracy, relative to letting all genders contribute equally.

Gender-equality promotes peace and reduces violence: “research has found robust support for a relationship between gender inequality and civil war. These results all point in the same direction; countries that display lower levels of gender equality are more likely to become involved in civil conflict, and violence is likely to be even more severe, than in countries where women have a higher status.” (note that this remains true even after compensating for GDP/capita)

Better gender-equality gives (heterosexual) women more, and better, orgasms.[1] This might not, strictly speaking, be hugely important to social organization (except perhaps by increasing women’s average happiness), but I wanted to mention it anyway, because really gender-equality is one of those things that are win-win-win all around for everyone.

The list of benefits of better gender-equality is much longer than this, I feel as if I could comfortably write an entire novel about the numerous benefits, large and small, of better gender-equality.

I could talk about improvements in the lives of homosexual people, about fathers who knows their children, about mothers with a career, about saving money, about being a teenager in a more gender-equal society, about civil rights, about reduction of crime, about lower child-poverty, about better mental health, about tolerance and acceptance, about a endless list of things.

But I think the above is enough.

I’d like to add though that most of the list above is true for ALL types of equality, not just gender-equality. We should not be so hung up on gender that we forget about or ignore other axes of discrimination such as race, religion, or disability

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How Did The Rightly Guided Caliphs help spread Islam.
Serggg [28]
I believe the answer is D
3 0
3 years ago
Discuss briefly the theory of Mead’s trilogy (mind, self, and society).Relate with – “The drive to make sense out of experience,
denis23 [38]

Answer:

Throughout the overview section down, the definition including its example in the case provided is defined.

Explanation:

  • The social scientist George Herbert Mead claimed that with enough encounters with several other individuals, people create self-images.  
  • He concluded that perhaps a component or consequence of communal experience seems to be the individuality, which would be the part of the foundation of an individual comprising of Knowledge of appearance and self-image.
3 0
3 years ago
Jane austen’s novel pride and prejudice (1813) is what classification of fiction?
Shkiper50 [21]
<span>“Pride and Prejudice” By Jane Austen might be seen as a comic novel, in fact is it a comedy of manners because it portrays the life of a family in the 18th century and the complexity of event among them. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
every statistic shows that people with a college education.make much more money over their working years , and are much happier
Stella [2.4K]

Answer: This statement could be both true and false because other factors come into play when several people with these characteristics are questioned.

Explanation:

Happiness is something relative since for each thing happiness represents something different. For many, happiness has to do with reaching the highest position in their workplace, for others, it is having a child and for others, it is simply having health. In the case of the statement expressed above, in some cases, the happiest people are those who have gone to college and have more money which is because many times happiness is associated with the amount of money a person makes. When a person has a good amount of money, he can buy the things he likes, help his family and cover expenses in case of an eventuality, which provides security and the person can feel better what in other cases translates to happiness. But there are also people who, although they have not reached a high educational level, have a fixed income of money and other elements, can also represent happiness.

The poorest communities may indeed in many cases not feel happy because they do not have money to buy something that is needed in the house such as food or a comfortable bed to sleep in, this causes discomfort and cannot be translated as happiness. Since happiness is relative, one cannot simply deduce that because a person has a good education and earns a lot of money, he will be happy, but compared to another with low resources to a certain degree, since happiness would be related to meeting present needs.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The religious movement that was closely linked to progressivism was
    13·1 answer
  • How did Georgians face challenges when fulfilling the charter during the trustee period?
    6·1 answer
  • What types of characteristics would you offer about a location you visited if someone asked, "What is it like?"
    13·2 answers
  • Professor Langley emphasizes that premature sexual activity among high school students involves the interplay of alcohol consump
    6·1 answer
  • Can i return something i bought at cvs to walmart shoplifting
    8·1 answer
  • What is an area of specialization minoans developed among its trade partners
    6·1 answer
  • Which are examples of education reforms in the mid-1800s?
    13·1 answer
  • In the book "Chains" by Laurie Halse Anderson what does Isabel compare Mr. Robert to in the beginning of Chapter III?
    9·1 answer
  • Sociology question !!!!​
    10·1 answer
  • You break it you buy it is often referred to as the what?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!