Answer:
104 and 624
Step-by-step explanation:
104x5=520
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x------> the cost of each ticket
we know that
----> inequality that represent the situation
solve for x
Divide by 3 both sides


Answer: 2.5 or 2 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
You can convert the mixed fractions to decimal numbers:
- Divide the numerator by the denominator of the fraction.
- Add the result to the whole number.
Thenyou have:
Barbara's time: 
Donna's time: 
Cindy's time: 
Nicole's time: 
As you can see, the fastest girl is Cindy and the slowest girl is Nicole.
Then, you must make the following subtraction to calculate the difference:
or 2 1/2
<h3>
Answer: b = 17</h3>
====================================================
Explanation:
The line must go through the point (5,2) which means x = 5 and y = 2 pair up together.
We'll plug these x and y values into the equation and solve for b.
y = -3x+b
2 = -3(5)+b
2 = -15+b
2+15 = b
17 = b
b = 17
The equation y = -3x+b turns into y = -3x+17