Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.
The old political party machine used to assign voters to specific regions in order to influence elections. Voter registration could prevent this action.
Voter registration also called enrollment is the requirement that a person otherwise eligible to vote register (or enroll) on an electoral roll before they will be entitled or permitted to vote. Such enrollment may be automatic or may require application being made by the eligible voter. The rules governing registration vary between jurisdictions.
I believe the answer is: The case was appealed and overturned at the state or federal appellate court level.
The supreme court has the highest standing compared to other courts on the lower level. Before a case could be handled in the supreme court, it need to pass both the state and appellate court. Even after passing the lower court, there is only around 1% chance that the case would be heard in the supreme court.
The correct answer is <em>C) "personal appeals"</em>.
When a speaker is searching for support in an audience it is very effective to refer to the friendship and loyalty that this audience has had towards the speaker until that moment and ask once again for their support regarding the upcoming decision-making process. This is a technique which political candidates use quite often during political meetings in the days prior to the election day. Proposals and the appliance of techniques such as exchange are no longer effective with such a tight deadline, leaving the personal appeal as the best way to reach an audience's emotions and get the necessary buy-in.
Answer:
A) geni-tal
Explanation:
Freud classified the psychological stages of childhood development in terms of psycho-sexual stages. He identified five stages which are or-al, an-al, phallic, latency and geni-tal. Each stage signifies and represents the sexual desires of an individual. The stages represent the development of each body part as the individual grows. The last stage in which the genital stage begins when the individual hits his puberty. It leads towards building relationships, gaining se-xual pleasures and se-xual inter-course.
