The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In France, a committee exists which has the job of eliminating subversive foreign influences in the form of words borrowed from other languages. English is a major offender (as in le bluejeans or le hamburger). This is an example of linguistic nationalism.
Countries such as France uses linguistic nationalism to support their own language, culture, customs, and tradition. They do not like to be affected by linguistic imperialism, where dominant foreigner countries try to use language as a form or influence on other nations. Linguistic nationalism promotes the language of the nation to strengthen the patriotic sense of pride in one's nation.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. The women in the middle east were the first people known to produce food through agriculture. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
There are different kinds of theory. The doctrine of preemption stipulates that if a state tries to pass a law that conflicts within an area that has federal legislative jurisdiction it will be found unconstitutional.
<h3>What is the doctrine of preemption?</h3>
The doctrine of preemption is known to be a theory that is based on the Supremacy Clause. This state that the federal law will preempts state law, even though there is conflict arising due to the laws.
By the above, a federal court does need a state to stop some behavior it believes does interferes with, or may be in conflict with federal law.
Learn more about doctrine of preemption from
brainly.com/question/10270212
The correct answer is the following.
There are many regulations that impact a new business. The government is strict to approve the operation of a new business because it tries to protect the consumer and the owner. Among the government regulations, you need to pass, are state Licensing. This is important to have the authorization to operate the business. Another regulation is the business taxes you have to pay. So be informed before opening the business. If your business is about food preparation, expect Health Department inspections. Finally, you have to check on the Department of Labor website for "Employment and labor laws."
Best answer: B. A state is sued for intentionally creating a Congressional district with a majority African-American population.
Background/context:
The landmark case regarding voting district lines was <em>Baker v. Carr </em>(1962), which pertained to voting districts in Tennessee. The plaintiff, Charles Baker, argued that voting districts, which had not been redrawn since 1901, heavily favored rural locations over urban centers which had grown significantly since then. Joe Carr was Secretary of State for Tennessee at the time, so was named in the case in regard to voting district lines as drawn by the state legislature. The Supreme Court ruled that voting districts were not merely a political matter to be decided by legislatures, but that they were subject to review by federal courts to determine their fairness.
The matter of redrawing district lines has come up in court cases recently as some state legislatures, when dominated by one political party, have "gerrymandered" district lines to try to maintain continued prominence for their party. Legislatures dominated by one party may redraw district lines (following the US Census) in ways that favor their party's candidates maintaining an advantage. Earlier this year, lawsuits were filed against the states of Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana, accusing those states of trying to isolate African-American voters to limit their impact on Congressional elections. According to <em>Courthouse News Service </em>(June 14, 2018), "In Georgia, Alabama and Louisiana, local lawyers filed lawsuits in federal court against each states’ Secretary of States ... alleging the Republican efforts in 2011 to redraw congressional lines left many of the minority black voters packed into one district and breaking up pockets of others."
