Answer:
False
Explanation:
A common size income statement is an income statement expressed in percentages. Each line item is expressed as a percentage of total revenue or total sales, not as a percentage of net income.
A common size income statement is used to analyze the relative weight of the company's accounts, e.g. gross margins, net margins, manufacturing expenses relative to total sales, etc.
Answer:
Jesus loves you have a blessed day!
Explanation:
Answer: 14.84%
Explanation:
To calculate the rate of return the investors received we will do a simple return formula to find out by how much, in terms of the Opening NAV, the fund has increased.
To find out how much the fund has increased by we can add up all the figures then deduct the opening balance.
= 39.71 + 0.64 + 1.13 - 36.12
= $5.36
$5.36 is the how much the fund has increased by.
Expressing it in percentage of the opening NAV per share we have,
= 5.36/36.12
= 0.14839424141
= 14.84%
14.84% is the rate of return that an investor received on the Yachtsman Fund in 2016.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": Reorganization.
Explanation:
A company reorganization takes place in front of the need for changing operating activities that are not bringing any profit to the organization or whose profit is minimal that it would be convenient to stop those processes. In some cases, reorganizations take place even when the firm has filed for bankruptcy.
Under those circumstances, the objective of the entity is to be forgiven for not meeting its payment obligations for a certain period while restructuring its operations to keep the business up and running.
Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.
