Answer:
A- Group think
Explanation:
In group think, bad decisions are often made because, rather than consider other alternatives, a group of people agree to a decision suggested by, in most cases, the most superior party in the room.
This form of thinking hides true opinions of other members of the group and though the decision is agreed upon, they could truly not want to be a part of the process.
In this scenario, there is an agreement with the Senior Executive on the plan of action however, nobody is interested in taking up the responsibility to follow through with the plan. This indicates a level of disagreement of other members with the plan regardless of the initially stated agreement with the plan.
Answer:
The right answer is A. Liabilities increased by $1.0 million in 2018
Explanation:
During 2017 and 2018, we have the following information:
+ In 2017, there is $2 million wages earned but not yet paid, so, Wages payable at the end of 2017 should be amounted to $2 million.
+ In 2018, there is another $8 million wages earned. At the same period, there is $7 million wages paid which is distributed as followed: $2 million to clear all Wages payable in 2017 and the other $5 million to clear $5 million out of $8 million wages payable in 2018. So, the only wages liability outstanding at the end of 2018 is the amount of $3 million earned in 2018 but not yet paid ($8 million - $5 million).
=> Liabilities in 2018 increases $1.0 million in comparison with the year 2017 ( $3 million - $2 million).
Answer:
RE decrease: 1,960,000
Explanation:
Retained earnings will decrease for the total amount of the dividends.
<u>stocks dividends</u>
560,000 shares
10% stock dividends: 560,000 x 10% = 56,000 shares
56,000 x $30 = 1,680,000 stock dividends
<u>cash dividends:</u>
560,000 x 0.50 per share = 280,000 cash dividends
Total dividends: 1,680,000 + 280,000 = 1,960,000
that will be the RE decrease
Answer:
competitor-oriented pricing
Explanation:
competitor-oriented pricing is a technique for valuing in which a producer's value is resolved more by the cost of a comparable item sold by an incredible contender than by contemplation of purchaser request and cost of generation; likewise alluded to as Competition-Based Pricing.
For instance: a firm needs to value another espresso producer. The company's rivals sell it at $25, and the organization thinks about that the best cost for the new espresso producer is $25. It chooses to set this very cost without anyone else item.
Answer:
Correct option is (b)
Explanation:
Time available for work if Melanie chooses to travel by air = 7 hours
Income per hour = $40
Total income earned if chooses to travel by air = 40 × 7 = $280
Time available for work if Melanie chooses to drive = 4 hours
Total income earned if chooses to drive = 40 × 4 = $160
Price differential = 280 - 160 = $120
As a rational decision maker, Melanie will choose to fly over drive only if her price differential is below $120. She will choose to drive if price differential is above $120.
