Answer:
The ending balance in the Allowance for Bad Debts is 20,500 CREDIT
Explanation:
The ending balance of Allowance for bad debts would be the 2.5% of sales
The adjustment is made to get the allowance for Bad Debt match the estimate uncollectible ammounts.
Notice it state <em>"company adjusted for bad debt expense"</em>
This means<u> it debit this account as much as it needed to be</u> to make allowance match the estimate allowance.
The write-off are transaction durign the period. They are irrelevant
So the ending balance is:
<em>2.5% of credit sales of 820,000 = $20,500</em>
It is important to remember that <u>Allowance is a counter-asset account</u>. His <em>normal balance is credit</em>, so the<u> final balance is credit.</u>
Answer:
The process cost summary is given below.
A-Total Material Cost = $22,500
B-Total Conversion costs = $95,625 (45,625+50,000)
C-Units transferred out = 40,000
D-Ending Inventory = 10,000
E-Equivalent units of material = 45,000
F-Equivalent units of conversion costs = 42,500
G-Equivalent cost per unit of material = $0.5 (A/E)
H-Equivalent cost per unit of conversion costs = $ 2.25 (B/F)
I-Equivalent cost per unit = $2.75 (G+H)
J-Cost of inventory transferred = $ 110,000 (I*C)
K-Cost Of Ending Inventory = $ 8,125 (H*(F-C) + (5000*0.5))
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
<u><em>the answer is A TRACK CHANGES . autocorrect is wrong it deletes the answer and changes it to the right one . but track changes shows all the changes you have made to the paper hope this helps. </em></u>
Answer:
It is 6.58%
Explanation:
Debt-Equity Ratio = Debt/Equity
0.68= Debt/358,200
Debt = 0.68 x 358,200
Debt = $243,576
Total Asset Turnover = Revenue/ Total Asset
Total Assets = Debt + Equity = $243,576+ $358,200=$601,776
1.2= Revenue/601,776
Revenue= 1.2 x 601,776
=$722,131.20
Profit Margin = Net income/ Revenue x 100%
= $47,500/$722,131.20 x100%
= 6.58%