There are 17.97 moles of calcium chloride would react with 5. 99 moles of aluminum oxide .
The balanced chemical equation between reaction between calcium chloride and aluminum oxide is given as,
→ 
The molar ratio of above reaction is 3:1
It means 3 moles of calcium chloride is require to react one mole of aluminum oxide.
The number of moles of calcium chloride requires to react with 5. 99 moles of aluminum oxide = 3 × 5. 99 = 17.97 moles
The equation in which number of atoms of elements in reactant side is equal to the number of atoms of elements in product side is called balanced chemical equation .
learn more about calcium chloride
brainly.com/question/15296925
#SPJ4
D.) There must be an equal number of atoms of each element on both sides of the equation
Answer:
Aluminium.
Explanation:
The above electronic configuration can be written in a simplified form as shown below:
1s² 2s²2p⁶ 3s²3p¹
Next, we shall determine the number of electrons in the atom of the element as follow:
Number electron = 2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 1
Number of electron = 13
Next, we shall determine the number of protons.
Since the element is in its neutral state,
The number of electrons and protons are equal i.e
Proton = Electron
Number of electron = 13
Proton = Electron = 13
Proton = 13
Next, we shall determine the atomic number of the element.
The atomic number of an element is simply the number of protons in the atom of the element i.e
Atomic number = proton number
Proton = 13
Atomic number = 13
Comparing the atomic number of the element with those in the periodic table, the element with the above electronic configuration is aluminium since no two elements have the same atomic number.
Answer:The process of science is iterative.
Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.
Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …
To find out the pressure in atm. You must divide 385 by 760. So pressure in atmospheres equals 385/760.
