<span>Third parties face many obstacles in the United States. In all states, the Democratic and Republican candidates automatically get on the ballot, whereas third-party candidates usually have to get thousands of signatures on petitions just to be listed on the ballot. The state and federal governments, which make rules governing elections, are composed of elected Democratic and Republican officials, who have a strong incentive to protect the existing duopoly. Also, third-party candidates often face financial difficulties because a party must have received at least 5 percent of the vote in the previous election in order to qualify for federal funds.</span>
Answer:
diversity
Explanation:
Diversity is defined as a specific range of people that possesses the different socioeconomic, ethnic, cultural, and racial background and different interests, lifestyles, and experiences.
"Diversity in the workplace" refers to a process that states a specific company's employees encompasses different people having distinct age, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, religion, religion languages, race, abilities, cultural background, education, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "diversity".
Scarcity effects people's life's through different ways they are
scarcity of food and scarcity of water could cause to death
Answer:
code of conduct
Explanation:
Its clearly the supervisor is disappointed and may have the right due to lack of effort by Leticia. Regardless of any situation as a supervisor, you must follow all terms of the code of conduct in a professional manner. Which depending on employer, usually consists of:
Personal behavior
integrity and values
compliance
respect for others
professionalism
These are just a few that are important to know and understand on both sides of employer, management and employees. By shouting out across office, where perhaps other fellow co-workers are present, violates most of these. Any disciplinary action should be in private with supervisor and employee and remain confidential with a written statement signed by both supervisor and employee with a witness present during this private meeting.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
