Answer:
Judicial activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.
In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
The answer is IT STARTED THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION.
Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.
<h3>
What is Historical revisionism?</h3>
Historical revisionism is the method via way of means of which the ancient record, the records of the society, as understood in its collective memory, constantly accounts for new information and interpretations of the activities which might be usually understood as records.
This manner of revisiting records has both advantageous and negative aspects.
Hence, Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.
learn more about Historic revisionism here:
brainly.com/question/8862527
#SPJ1
