Answer:
If both companies have the sames sales volume, total costs and income from operations, the reason why Gouda has a lower break even point is that their variable costs are lower. We use the contribution margin per unit to calculate the break even point and the contribution margin per unit = sales price - variable costs. The question states that total costs are equal, but it doesn't say anything about variable or fixed costs.
Assuming that Gouda is above break even point, each sale will generate a higher operating profit since the contribution margin is higher.
Explanation:
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the most efficient fix for this error would be to use Find and Replace. This is a feature that allows you to type the error that you made, and the console will find every instance of that error throughout the entire document and change each iteration to whatever you want.
Answer:
The correct answer is the letter b. This is a common occurrence. The policymaker usually disregards an economist's advice because they do not believe it is the most efficient policy.
Explanation:
It is common for policymakers to disregard the advice of an economist. This is because in addition to their often finding that the policies suggested by economists are not the most efficient, they observe the political return of such action, ie not just efficiency, but the extent to which this policy will bring political benefits. Thus, as in this case, the policy is not implemented because it is not popular with voters.
<span>Let amount invested at 9% be "x"; Interest on this is 0.09x dollars
Amt. invested at 10% is "15000-x" ; Interest on this is 0.1(15000-x)=1500-0.1x
dollars
EQUATION:
interext + interest=1432 dollars
0.09x + 1500-0.10x = 1432
-0.01x = -68
x=$6800 (amt invested at 9%)
15000-6800=$8200 (amt invested at 10%)</span>
Option D , The money supply will decrease as banks loan out less money.
Explanation:
Banks are lending their deposits and increasing the economic supply of money. Nevertheless, if the bank holds more money and invests less then the supply of money into the economy rises.
Conversely, the ratio increased, boosted, lowered the cash multiplier, and decreased the supply of money. Expansionary fiscal policy is the decrease in the necessary reserve ratio; contraction monetary policy is the rise in the reserve ratio.
When attempting to control the monetary supply, the Fed has two challenges. Firstly, the Federal does not regulate the amount of cash families want to keep in their accounts as deposits. The second problem seems to be that the banks ' capital is not verified by the Fed. If the banks opt for more excess reserves and deposits, the sum of money will be lower.
